|
RIAA
vs.
MUSIC PIRATES
Is
Shawn Fanning the blame? What about 12
yr. Old Brianna Lahara or Sarah Seabury,
a sixty-five yr. Old women who was sued
by the RIAA for downloading free music.
Has downloading music for free on the
Internet affecting hip-hop album sells?
According to the RIAA they are, but how?
Say you have a new artist on an established
record label. He/she has a hot song on
the street, but the sells on the single
are not so good, because of downloading.
Now its time for this artist album to
be released, and his/her album have been
online for free downloading two weeks
before the original release date. Due
to downloading this artist has been affected
by poor album sells, plus depending on
his/her contract, this artist can loose
up to $80,000. Because of poor album sells
this artist will have a hard time touring,
and if this artist doesn't tour he/she
cannot push the album further and the
artist looses more money. Now its time
for your second album to be released and
the executives don't believe that your
album will do so well, so they will turn
their attention to the next artist. Now
your dreams of becoming the biggest rap
star and changing the game have turn into
a nightmare. The RIAA a taking drastic
measures to prevent people from downloading
free music. One; they've released a commercial
with rap artist such as DMX asking fans
to stop download music for free. They
also have sent IM (Instant Messages) to
those who they think are downloading numerous
files. The IM reads trading copy written
songs is illegal and hurts the songwriter
and musician. Now they are making examples
out of downloaders by suing them for large
sums of money. Shawn Fanning the founder
of Napster.com was sued by 18 major record
companies for offering free downloadable
music, also Daniel Peng of Princeton University
was also sued by the RIAA and has to pay
$15,000 in penalties. Congress even wants
to make downloading free music a felony
crime. Downloaders on the other hand feel
that these acts against them are pointless
and extreme. Downloaders feel with artist
such as 50 cents who sold 4 million copies
of "Get rich or die tryin" which
the highest selling rap album of 2003.
In 2000 Eminem sold 1.7 million copies
in a week with "The Marshall Mathers
LP," and Nas, who sold 343,000 copies
of his album had the highest selling debut
album with "Stillmatic." All
of these albums are available on file-sharing
web sites, but all three of these artist
albums reached platinum status. With artist
like Jay-z, Nelly, Ja-Rule, and many others
rap artist with multi-platinum albums
they feel that they are not affecting
albums sells at all. So why don't downloaders
buy CD's out of the store? Downloaders
say the download because albums are expensive
and most of them are not so good and they
end up liking two songs out of sixteen.
They also believe its fun and cheaper,
because of the poor economy. Downloaders
feel that they aren't affecting the artist
in the pockets because of shows like MTV
Cribs that displays artist wealth. Downloaders
feel that they are being treating worst
than bootleggers that are on the street.
They feels its easier to catch bootleggers
with numerous amounts of the same album
that they have downloaded once, so why
don't they have the same extreme laws
against bootleggers and they've been around
before the computer downloaders ask. So
what happens next in the war on downloading,
the saga continuous.
Edioral
Written by: J.O.
COMMENT
ON THIS EDITORIAL
|